| Comments on the clues |
|---|
| 1. A sprog's two WWI medals |
| 1. | I guess the medals' names were derived from 'pipsqueak', so this is more of a double def. | | 2. | Interesting World War one trivia, as an internet search reveals, but perhaps more could have been done with this idea. |
|
| 2. Animosity about police sergeant, a constant very petty thing |
| 1. | Surface is not very natural. |
|
| 3. Contemptible one shows up to defeat sea king, taking hold of queen |
| 1. | Don't think "shows up" works very well for the cryptic. |
|
| 4. Contemptible person's clever remarks point to Spooner |
| 1. | Normally I loathe Spoonerisms but this one is amusing and subtle. | | 2. | Good idea, but the surface reading is weak – why is the person contemptible? | | 3. | My preferred one of the spoonerisms. | | 4. | Wonderful clue worth 5 points | | 5. | Nice use of point. | | 6. | An excellent Spoonerism, although for me just pipped (sorry) by the more concise 34. | | 7. | It seems a good idea to use a Spoonerism when the opportunity arises. I thought this the best. |
|
| 5. Contemptibly insignificant fellow peaks with a quip! |
| 1. | Needs an anagram indicator, and no 'a' | | 2. | a.i. might be clearer as "Insignificant fellow contemptibly …" | | 3. | Is 'contemptibly' the anagram indicator? If so, shouldn't it be in the middle of the clue? |
|
| 6. Criminal equips pack, head of crowbar poking out, the despicable man |
| 1. | 'The' is perhaps redundant. | | 2. | An imaginative attempt at fodder. I wasn't completely persuaded by poking out (deletion), criminal (anagrind) or despicable man (def). |
|
| 7. Did Orlick make Philip do this insignificant thing? |
| 1. | The cryptic definition leads to 'squeak', not 'pipsqueak' | | 2. | Intention seems to be "Did Orlick make Pip squeak?" but it doesn't work. | | 3. | I like the literary reference. |
|
| 8. Dingbat quips within the summit! (9) |
| 1. | You can't give one word two roles like this, it's neither & lit. nor plain | | 2. | Double duty of "dingbat" makes for a poor clue. |
|
| 9. I speak up animatedly to defend Queen being described as a 'nobody' |
| 1. | Nice definition, surface rather implausible, I think | | 2. | Really good use double us of 'being' | | 3. | Well done. A clear winner. Loved the use of "being". Thanks for pointing it out in explanation as I may have missed it otherwise. | | 4. | Slightly ambiguous – is the speaker defending the queen or her description? Clever use of "being" in definition. |
|
| 11. Insignificant quip? Speak up! |
| 1. | I am not sure that 'up' works as an anagrind. | | 2. | Since 'insignificant' is only in the dictionaries as an adjective it can't really be used to define 'pipsqueak' which is a noun. | | 3. | The justification of "up" is presumably that it can mean something like "excited". I think it's dodgy – it's a different kind of excited. |
|
| 12. Insignificant spot? Southern half of Quebec to Alaska? |
| 1. | Since 'insignificant' is only in the dictionaries as an adjective it can't really be used to define 'pipsqueak' which is a noun. | | 2. | A rather contrived way to indicate Canada's size. |
|
| 13. Kill, and confess nothing |
| 1. | Someone's done their homework. Great combination |
|
| 14. KP's pique; a twisted, contemptible thing |
| 1. | Something specific seems required to indicate cricketer Kevin Pieterson, otherwise the initials KP are just arbitrary. |
|
| 15. Midget quips rudely during climax |
| 1. | Use opf QUIPS not too original, but surface makes up for it. | | 2. | My only question mark over this is the use of "during". | | 3. | Hmmm! Quite a suggestive surface reading! |
|
| 16. Nobody gets the better of Kirkpatrick when in pursuit of a lassie that shall be nameless |
| 1. | 'Gets the better of' is redundant in the wordplay, I think | | 2. | Very wordy. "when in pursuit of a lassie that shall be nameless" could be "pursuing a nameless lassie". |
|
| 18. Nobody let offensive quips disrupt summit |
| 1. | Quite subtle – you need to read "let" as an instruction, but offensive is a questionable a.i. |
|
| 19. Nobody quips about crashing into mountain |
| 1. | "crashing into" to indicate insertion is a bit over the top. (I assume 'crashing' is not a second anagram indicator). |
|
| 20. Nobody speak — quip's terrible! |
| 1. | Nice and short but rather an unoriginal anagram. |
|
| 21. Nobody spots an end to deadlock over recurrent EU question |
| 1. | Unusual but correct cryptic use of "recurrent". A tricky and ingenious clue. | | 2. | The explanation is very misleading. It should read, eg, EU q (rev) in (pips + a + k) |
|
| 22. Nobody’s hurt when rider falls in lake naked |
| 1. | I liked it all up to 'naked'. Had it been 'unclothed' it would have been excellent | | 2. | Don't like this use of "naked". |
|
| 23. Nonentity's resentment about writer's supplementary note on Alaska |
| 1. | "writer's supplementary note" for PS is a bit long-winded. |
|
| 24. Nothing beats playing Quake |
| 1. | Wonderful surface, and concise. | | 2. | Excellent clue with very natural surface, although I was only vaguely aware of this video game. |
|
| 25. One with great expectations quakes violently, the little upstart (9) |
| 1. | The definition is a bit awry here – a pipsqueak is not an upstart, although might be called one. | | 2. | An interesting combination of cryptic answer and anagram. |
|
| 26. Pak's pique-being treated/viewed with contempt (8) |
| 1. | "being treated" as both anagram indicator and part of the definition doesn't work. "/viewed" seems unnecessary. |
|
| 27. Pique as KP circulates text, one provoking contempt |
| 1. | Nice if dated reference to the text message hoo-ha, although I'm not convinced by "circulates text" to indicate the anagram. | | 2. | Great surface and anagram | | 3. | Another really good clue just behind 4 I think | | 4. | Nice work. Circulates text was clever. |
|
| 28. Pique as KP Nuts revealed shrimp!
|
| 1. | Best use of the KP. | | 2. | Well, at least it wasn't horse! |
|
| 29. Pitiful sod needs grass seed on |
| 1. | Lovely misleading def. | | 2. | "on" is rather weak. |
|
| 31. Quips' peak – the height of absurdity in distinguished don's exchange with little man (9) |
| 1. | Not sure how this actually works as a cryptic clue | | 2. | Interesting attempt to do something different with a Spoonerism, but giving the jumbled phrase verbatim makes the clue too easy. | | 3. | Thought this definitely the best clue this month. |
|
| 32. Speak and quip about something insignificant (9) |
|
| 33. Spooner exclaims "Sally, say nothing!" |
| 1. | Including the definition in the quote doesn't work. |
|
| 34. Spooner's cracks nettle nobody. |
| 1. | The best of the Spooners | | 2. | Best of the Spooners | | 3. | Excellent concise Spoonerism. |
|
| 35. Two small noises that are insignificant |
| 1. | Since 'insignificant' is only in the dictionaries as an adjective it can't really be used to define 'pipsqueak' which is a noun. | | 2. | Rather lightweight. |
|
| 36. Unnamed Scots lass found in skip injured after parking motorbike |
| 1. | I would have liked to see some justification for "motorbike" as the definition. |
|
| 37. Wearing Lycra, contemptible type quickly appears flustered |
| 1. | I think the definition "contemptible type" needs to be at the beginning of the clue. | | 2. | A imaginative attempt at fodder and anagrind. |
|
| 38. With Spooner's little man, jokes reach a climax we hear! |
| 1. | The def. seems to be 'Spooner's little man', which is not right | | 2. | "We hear" is unnecessary – it's already implied by the fact that this is a Spoonerism. |
|
| 39. Worm prevents quake – Extraordinary! |
| 1. | Unconvincing surface, despite the "extraordinary!" | | 2. | A delightful surface, but, unfortunately, "prevents" = "pips" won't really do. |
|
| 40. Would he ape UKIP's irritation about question of being insignificant? |
| 1. | As a (semi) &lit, the clue is a poor definition, and the wordplay element 'ape UKIP's irritation about question' is misplaced. |
|