CCCWC February competition voters’ comments on Clue no. 5

You’re not logged in

Login

Register and join

Crossword Centre

Azed Slip Archive

CCCWC February competition voters’ comments

Clue no. 5: Busy bottle-washer locks bottles up (8)

Back to competitor’s clues | All the comments | Other competitions

A clue to SHERLOCK.
5 comments refer to this clue (from 5 competitors, 0 others)
Move your mouse pointer over any bold clue number to see the clue.

Here is the text

Comments on the clue

1.	Good, though the word order is unnatural in the cryptic reading. I like 'bottles up', but why should the bottles be locked up?
2.	Good def and good SI — 5 points!
3.	Nicely misleading surface

Comments on the competition
1.
There are a lot of clues this month but none stood out and I found it hard to allocate big points. I awarded most points to 5 which works well and would have me thinking and to 3 as the best of the shock envelopes. I also gave points to 7 because the clue makes sense as a statement and for me is the pick of the Shylocks. I also gave points to 37 which is very clever and would have allocated more were it not a little too easy to solve.
2.
5 points 5 The definition is a bit of a stretch, but the surface is excellent and amusing and the s.i. (if I put on one side my personal aversion to the “bit of” convention) so neat that the clue deserves top marks 3 points each: 44 I don’t think that this clue would get past Azed as a valid composite anagram, since there is no “break” between the two halves (as he insists is required), but this is not one of Azed’s competitions and the clue is admirably economical and neat. 57 neat and a genuine &lit 2 points each: 24 the wording (“sinister criminal outbreak”) is slightly artificial, but this not a bad &lit 29 the subsidiary indication aspect of this &lit is very well done, the definition aspect slightly forced. Prox. ac. 4 This is cleverly constructed, introducing Holmes without making it too obvious that it is the definition. The connection between Brandeis and OWH, as fellow liberal members of the Supreme Court, is clear and it seems that OWH was keen on chess, but the surface is weakened by the facts that there does not seem to be any evidence that Brandeis had much interest in the game and that it is somewhat unlikely that a pawn would ever be in a position to take an opponent’s “final pieces”, whatever that might mean exactly. 14 A clever idea neatly executed, but “house” = “shack” is hardly fair, I feel. 26 The topical surface is rather spoiled by the artificiality of the phrase “equine racing’s loss”. 37 If the criterion for a clue’s being &lit is (as I believe to be the case) that every word must make a meaningful contribution to both the definition and the subsidiary indication, then this clue is no &lit, since more than half the words make no contribution to the s.i. at all. What’s more, I don’t think that either “flamboyant” or “slick” is a very accurate epithet for Sherlock Holmes.