CCCWC September competition voters’ comments
Clue no. 46: Those who know the answers are the ones to hit the buzzers
Back to competition result |
All the comments |
Other competitions
A clue to SWATS.
2 comments refer to this clue (from 1 competitor, 1 other)
Move your mouse pointer over any bold clue number to see the clue.
Here is the text
| Comments on the competition |
|---|
| 1. |
|---|
SWATS was quite difficult to get to grips with especially if, like me, you missed the 'beer' definition and had to think of something original to do with a plural noun or 3rd person verb, and it was great to see so many competitors up for the challenge. Initial letters clues were plentiful, so something special was needed here, and only no 15 really delivered, with properly grammatical wordplay and a decent & lit. (and despite my aversion to otiose exclamation marks). Likewise double definitions had to produce a convincing surface rather than just stringing two meanings together, and no 46 did this best with the 'hits the buzzers' idea. No 18 (the other 'buzzer') just missed my top 5. Not many misleading definitions considering the number of alternatives for 'hits', but 43 found a good one. 29 was one of the best & lit. clues. 'Rebel' for 'Wat' is just about ok, and while 30's 'Rose Tyler' has very clever wordplay, the definition is a bit of a let-down.
The main faults I found were: i) Not indicating initial letters properly (e.g. 'Primary school with…' in 27), ii) some unconvincing definitions (NUS=swats? – not in my experience), and iii) the usual surplus verbiage: more is almost always less in cryptic clues, so 19's twenty-one words put me off before I even started to read it. |
| 2. |
|---|
| A good variety of treatments. 18 and 46's misleading use of 'hit the buzzer' was very pleasing, the latter double definition seeming stronger in the end for its simplicity. I didn't know the 'new ale' meaning or 'wat' as drunk, which 48 and 53 used to good effect. 51 I liked, but was a little uncertain about 'times' to indicate TS – 'times' = TT seems fair (as with 'news' = NN) but when would one use the plural form of an abbreviation like that? And 54 was very neat, but long – either half (the second with a question mark) would have done the job. Prize for shortest clue, of course, goes to 23, but NUS=swats? Not when I was a member! |
