CCCWC September competition voters’ comments
Clue no. 43: Tests power units in lamps
Back to competition result |
All the comments |
Other competitions
A clue to SWATS.
3 comments refer to this clue (from 3 competitors, 0 others)
Move your mouse pointer over any bold clue number to see the clue.
Here is the text
| Comments on the competition |
|---|
| 1. |
|---|
| I thought this was an excellent set of clues, with a pleasing variety of approaches – which didn't make voting any easier. I gave 5 points to clue 29, which combined the WAT and S-S elements ingeniously. 4 points to clue 48, a very clever combination of two Scottish words in an &lit. 3 points to clue 15, which I thought was the best of the initial/final letters &lits. 2 points for clue 54, original and clever, though I didn't think 'with release of energy' quite worked. And 1 point for clue 43, which is simple but highly effective. |
| 2. |
|---|
SWATS was quite difficult to get to grips with especially if, like me, you missed the 'beer' definition and had to think of something original to do with a plural noun or 3rd person verb, and it was great to see so many competitors up for the challenge. Initial letters clues were plentiful, so something special was needed here, and only no 15 really delivered, with properly grammatical wordplay and a decent & lit. (and despite my aversion to otiose exclamation marks). Likewise double definitions had to produce a convincing surface rather than just stringing two meanings together, and no 46 did this best with the 'hits the buzzers' idea. No 18 (the other 'buzzer') just missed my top 5. Not many misleading definitions considering the number of alternatives for 'hits', but 43 found a good one. 29 was one of the best & lit. clues. 'Rebel' for 'Wat' is just about ok, and while 30's 'Rose Tyler' has very clever wordplay, the definition is a bit of a let-down.
The main faults I found were: i) Not indicating initial letters properly (e.g. 'Primary school with…' in 27), ii) some unconvincing definitions (NUS=swats? – not in my experience), and iii) the usual surplus verbiage: more is almost always less in cryptic clues, so 19's twenty-one words put me off before I even started to read it. |
| 3. |
|---|
| A large number of decent clues this month with a wide variety of themes made it difficult to whittle down to 15 points. In the end I was resigned to ruling out clues containing extranneous words or with poor surface reading; even then the task wasn't easy. I particularly liked no 41's definition of "muggers" and 43's simplicity and brevity. |
