CCCWC April competition voters’ comments
Clue no. 38: Plot to dispose of the late leader of governing party.
Back to competition result |
All the comments |
Other competitions
A clue to GRAVE.
3 comments refer to this clue (from 3 competitors, 0 others)
Move your mouse pointer over any bold clue number to see the clue.
Here is the text
| Comments on the competition |
|---|
| 1. |
|---|
A clue-word with numerous meanings and offering a wide range of potential approaches. There were fewer instances of unsoundness than usual and a fair number of perfectly acceptable clues. In awarding points, I gave precedence to clues offering originality of approach (especially with respect to the definition), clever wordplay and, as always, a convincing and satisfying surface.
3 points each to:
25 Although, strictly speaking, this clue is flawed by its failure to indicate that, in these senses, “how” is dialect and “sad” archaic, it is so neat that I am prepared to overlook that.
38 A cleverly hidden definition and sound word play contributing to a convincing (and arguably topical) surface.
57 An admirably succinct composite anagram offering a very clever double definition. Whether it is an &lit in the normally accepted sense of the term is arguable, however.
2 points each to:
36 At the time of writing (7 May), it remains to be seen how apposite this clue will turn out to be, but it is tautly constructed and with a convincing topical surface.
40 A well crafted clue with a convincing surface, but there is less sparkle to the definition than in 25, 38 and 57.
1 point to:
31 A good definition appropriate to the surface, but the wordplay in the s.i. is a bit predictable.
0.5 point each to:
13 As economical as 25 and the double definition is entirely sound, but “Death count” is a rather artificial phrase and hardly a recognized alternative to “body count”.
42 Economical with a convincing surface, but grave4 means “in a solemn manner” and “solemn” and “serious”, though associated in meaning, are not quite the same thing |
| 2. |
|---|
My favourite here was 36 which was both suitably misleading and topical. In a similar vein, I was also very keen on 38 at first, and cryptically, i think it works very well, but on re-reading it, the surface isn't quite right for me. Why would there be a plot to get rid of a leader who is already late?
My original efforts at this tried to incorporate Viagra and I see that a few did it more successful than myself – 55 was my favourite of these.
Alos, interesting to see another reference to Brian Jones of the Rolling Stones. Didn't he make it into one of the competitions a couple of months ago?? |
| 3. |
|---|
I couldn't separate the top two, each of which was very good.
1st= (3 points each): 12, 38
3rd= (1.5 points each): 7 (I can't quite convince myself that the definition is OK, but it's very clever), 55 (the best of the Viagra hiddens, this has an excellent definition)
5th= (1 point each): 3, 13, 29, 43, 49, 57 |
